Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Validity of reassessment proceedings - New regime u/s 148A - The impugned notice dated 30.03.2021 ought to have been decided in accordance with the new provisions with effect from 01.04.2021 in terms of decision of Ashish Agarwal [2022 (5) TMI 240 - SUPREME COURT] as it has been admittedly served on the petitioner only on 07.04.2021 in terms of annexure to Section 142(1) notice dated 16.08.2021. - HC
Validity of reassessment proceedings - New regime u/s 148A - The impugned notice dated 30.03.2021 ought to have been decided in accordance with the new provisions with effect from 01.04.2021 in terms of decision of Ashish Agarwal [2022 (5) TMI 240 - SUPREME COURT] as it has been admittedly served on the petitioner only on 07.04.2021 in terms of annexure to Section 142(1) notice dated 16.08.2021. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.