Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Validity of attachment orders u/s 281B - issuance of fresh attachment order again and again, i.e. for the fourth time - this Court is of the view that the respondent-Department under the guise of impugned attachment orders, shall not cause any unnecessary hardships to the Bankers in getting back their loans, which were lent by them to the petitioners. - Matter remanded back with directions - HC
Validity of attachment orders u/s 281B - issuance of fresh attachment order again and again, i.e. for the fourth time - this Court is of the view that the respondent-Department under the guise of impugned attachment orders, shall not cause any unnecessary hardships to the Bankers in getting back their loans, which were lent by them to the petitioners. - Matter remanded back with directions - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
