Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Adjustment of refund against demand - requirement of prior intimation under section 245 of the Act was a mandatory requirement and failure to comply with this mandatory requirement of prior intimation would make the entire adjustment as wholly illegal and, therefore, the respondents could not have made the adjustment as they wanted to. - HC
Adjustment of refund against demand - requirement of prior intimation under section 245 of the Act was a mandatory requirement and failure to comply with this mandatory requirement of prior intimation would make the entire adjustment as wholly illegal and, therefore, the respondents could not have made the adjustment as they wanted to. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
