Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Adjustment of refund against demand - requirement of prior intimation under section 245 of the Act was a mandatory requirement and failure to comply with this mandatory requirement of prior intimation would make the entire adjustment as wholly illegal and, therefore, the respondents could not have made the adjustment as they wanted to. - HC
Adjustment of refund against demand - requirement of prior intimation under section 245 of the Act was a mandatory requirement and failure to comply with this mandatory requirement of prior intimation would make the entire adjustment as wholly illegal and, therefore, the respondents could not have made the adjustment as they wanted to. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.