Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Dismissal of appeal - appeals have not been filed by a person authorized under Rule 3 of Customs Appeal Rules, 1982 - Appeal filed by CHA - procedural lapse or not - This deficiency should have been pointed out by the Commissioner (Appeals) to the appellant and the same could have been corrected. This cannot be a ground for rejection of appeal itself. - AT
Dismissal of appeal - appeals have not been filed by a person authorized under Rule 3 of Customs Appeal Rules, 1982 - Appeal filed by CHA - procedural lapse or not - This deficiency should have been pointed out by the Commissioner (Appeals) to the appellant and the same could have been corrected. This cannot be a ground for rejection of appeal itself. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.