Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Addition u/s 40(A) - service charges paid to division of the holding company - assessee has been able to demonstrate that the services were charged by SCS to the assessee only by way of reimbursement of costs and no excessive sum was charged to the assessee - AO cannot invoke Sec. 40A(2) without demonstrating excessive & unreasonable expenses. - AT
Addition u/s 40(A) - service charges paid to division of the holding company - assessee has been able to demonstrate that the services were charged by SCS to the assessee only by way of reimbursement of costs and no excessive sum was charged to the assessee - AO cannot invoke Sec. 40A(2) without demonstrating excessive & unreasonable expenses. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.