Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Addition u/s 40(A) - service charges paid to division of the holding company - assessee has been able to demonstrate that the services were charged by SCS to the assessee only by way of reimbursement of costs and no excessive sum was charged to the assessee - AO cannot invoke Sec. 40A(2) without demonstrating excessive & unreasonable expenses. - AT
Addition u/s 40(A) - service charges paid to division of the holding company - assessee has been able to demonstrate that the services were charged by SCS to the assessee only by way of reimbursement of costs and no excessive sum was charged to the assessee - AO cannot invoke Sec. 40A(2) without demonstrating excessive & unreasonable expenses. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
