Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Validity of Revision u/s 263 - Even if it were to be accepted that the assessment has been completed by mere reference to the provisions of section 44AD by the AO, even then, in our view Principal CIT was correct in observing that reference could not have been drawn to the said provisions as the total quantum of transaction was exceeding Rs. 60 lacs in the year under consideration. - Revision order sustained - AT
Validity of Revision u/s 263 - Even if it were to be accepted that the assessment has been completed by mere reference to the provisions of section 44AD by the AO, even then, in our view Principal CIT was correct in observing that reference could not have been drawn to the said provisions as the total quantum of transaction was exceeding Rs. 60 lacs in the year under consideration. - Revision order sustained - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.