Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Undisclosed income (from equity transactions) - unexplained investment (by way of cash deposit) u/s 69 r/w Section 115 BBE - huge amount of money was transacted using the Firm's PAN number - Assessment against deceased partner - AO ought to have compared the income that was proposed to be added pursuant to notice dated 31.03.2022 with the income declared by the petitioner's deceased husband (late) while finalizing the assessment. There is no comparison. - Matter restored back - HC
Undisclosed income (from equity transactions) - unexplained investment (by way of cash deposit) u/s 69 r/w Section 115 BBE - huge amount of money was transacted using the Firm's PAN number - Assessment against deceased partner - AO ought to have compared the income that was proposed to be added pursuant to notice dated 31.03.2022 with the income declared by the petitioner's deceased husband (late) while finalizing the assessment. There is no comparison. - Matter restored back - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.