Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
TP Adjustment - TPO rejected the ‘entity-level’ benchmarking done by assessee, instead made ‘unit-level’ comparison i.e. PLI of each unit was compared with the PLI of external comparables - 'principle of res judicata' OR ‘principle of consistency' - the uniform rate agreed by assessee with AEs is certainly a rate at entity-level which has no connection or linkage with individual units. - AT
TP Adjustment - TPO rejected the ‘entity-level’ benchmarking done by assessee, instead made ‘unit-level’ comparison i.e. PLI of each unit was compared with the PLI of external comparables - 'principle of res judicata' OR ‘principle of consistency' - the uniform rate agreed by assessee with AEs is certainly a rate at entity-level which has no connection or linkage with individual units. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.