Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Validity of order u/s 119(2)(b) - Rejection of request for Condonation of delay in filing of Income Tax Return (ITR) - Non speaking order - This Court finds that the impugned order is made in violation thereof, in view of the fact that the impugned order does not assign reason but only contains the conclusion, in other words non-speaking and thus unsustainable. - HC
Validity of order u/s 119(2)(b) - Rejection of request for Condonation of delay in filing of Income Tax Return (ITR) - Non speaking order - This Court finds that the impugned order is made in violation thereof, in view of the fact that the impugned order does not assign reason but only contains the conclusion, in other words non-speaking and thus unsustainable. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.