Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Maintainability appeal before High Court - Substantial Question of Law - Imposition of penalty u/s 114AA of Customs Broker / CHA - CESTAT found that the case of the appellant that respondent/CHA was in violation of regulation 10(a), 10(d) and 10(n) of CBLR was not made out, and consequently the impugned order as well as the penalty imposed were set aside. - Revenue failed to raise any question of law - HC
Maintainability appeal before High Court - Substantial Question of Law - Imposition of penalty u/s 114AA of Customs Broker / CHA - CESTAT found that the case of the appellant that respondent/CHA was in violation of regulation 10(a), 10(d) and 10(n) of CBLR was not made out, and consequently the impugned order as well as the penalty imposed were set aside. - Revenue failed to raise any question of law - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
