Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Assessee in Default u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) - period of limitation - non deduction of TDS - the term ‘reasonable period’ in the absence of any statutory limitation cannot be accepted as a straight jacket answer. - Since the CIT(A) and ITAT have accepted the period of limitation to be four (4) years, which in the teeth of the order of the Division Bench in the case of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited (supra) cannot be said to be proper, legal or justified. - HC
Assessee in Default u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) - period of limitation - non deduction of TDS - the term ‘reasonable period’ in the absence of any statutory limitation cannot be accepted as a straight jacket answer. - Since the CIT(A) and ITAT have accepted the period of limitation to be four (4) years, which in the teeth of the order of the Division Bench in the case of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited (supra) cannot be said to be proper, legal or justified. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
