Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Addition u/s 68 - assessee’s alleged failure to explain as to why the subject shares which had a face value of Rs. 10/- were issued at a premium of Rs. 90/- per share - total value of per share was Rs. 100 which was well below the value arrived at as per the valuation report. - CIT(A) correctly observed that it was not a sham transaction - HC
Addition u/s 68 - assessee’s alleged failure to explain as to why the subject shares which had a face value of Rs. 10/- were issued at a premium of Rs. 90/- per share - total value of per share was Rs. 100 which was well below the value arrived at as per the valuation report. - CIT(A) correctly observed that it was not a sham transaction - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
