Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 - assessee’s alleged failure to explain as to why the subject shares which had a face value of Rs. 10/- were issued at a premium of Rs. 90/- per share - total value of per share was Rs. 100 which was well below the value arrived at as per the valuation report. - CIT(A) correctly observed that it was not a sham transaction - HC
Addition u/s 68 - assessee’s alleged failure to explain as to why the subject shares which had a face value of Rs. 10/- were issued at a premium of Rs. 90/- per share - total value of per share was Rs. 100 which was well below the value arrived at as per the valuation report. - CIT(A) correctly observed that it was not a sham transaction - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.