Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Insider trading in the scrip of the Company - Appellant was in possession of this price sensitive information and had traded in the scrip during the period in question. In our opinion, obtaining necessary pre clearance and making requisite disclosures were not enough to show that his trades were not motivated by UPSI - Appellant had violated Section 12A(d) and (e) of the SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulation 4(1) of the PIT Regulations. - AT
Insider trading in the scrip of the Company - Appellant was in possession of this price sensitive information and had traded in the scrip during the period in question. In our opinion, obtaining necessary pre clearance and making requisite disclosures were not enough to show that his trades were not motivated by UPSI - Appellant had violated Section 12A(d) and (e) of the SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulation 4(1) of the PIT Regulations. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
