Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Insider trading in the scrip of the Company - Appellant was in possession of this price sensitive information and had traded in the scrip during the period in question. In our opinion, obtaining necessary pre clearance and making requisite disclosures were not enough to show that his trades were not motivated by UPSI - Appellant had violated Section 12A(d) and (e) of the SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulation 4(1) of the PIT Regulations. - AT
Insider trading in the scrip of the Company - Appellant was in possession of this price sensitive information and had traded in the scrip during the period in question. In our opinion, obtaining necessary pre clearance and making requisite disclosures were not enough to show that his trades were not motivated by UPSI - Appellant had violated Section 12A(d) and (e) of the SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulation 4(1) of the PIT Regulations. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
