Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Estimation of Profit/Section 40A(2)(b) - JV entered - sub-contracting - AO had formed a view that the assessee JV had suppressed its profit by making excessive payment to TPPL - the section 40A(2)(b) has no application to income aspect of the assessee JV in the facts of the instant case. The AO has not brought any comparable figures to disallow the expenditure, moreover with the structuring of the JV provisions of Section 40A(2)(b) are not attracted in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case. - Additions deleted - AT
Estimation of Profit/Section 40A(2)(b) - JV entered - sub-contracting - AO had formed a view that the assessee JV had suppressed its profit by making excessive payment to TPPL - the section 40A(2)(b) has no application to income aspect of the assessee JV in the facts of the instant case. The AO has not brought any comparable figures to disallow the expenditure, moreover with the structuring of the JV provisions of Section 40A(2)(b) are not attracted in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case. - Additions deleted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
