Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Special audit u/s. 142(2A) - Challenge on the ground that order is subjective satisfaction, is non-speaking and has been mechanically passed - The objection of petitioner that there is no material to show that interest of Revenue was adversely affected hence the special audit was not helpful, has no legs to stand in view of element of public interest being pre-dominant in the object behind special audit. - HC
Special audit u/s. 142(2A) - Challenge on the ground that order is subjective satisfaction, is non-speaking and has been mechanically passed - The objection of petitioner that there is no material to show that interest of Revenue was adversely affected hence the special audit was not helpful, has no legs to stand in view of element of public interest being pre-dominant in the object behind special audit. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.