Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Insolvency and BankruptcyOctober 13, 2023Case LawsHC
Extinguishment of claims - approval of the Resolution Plan - The Court is of the considered opinion that approval of the Resolution Plan in terms given clearly amounts to the extinguishment of all debts that were owed by the corporate debtor except to the extent as was admitted in the Resolution Plan. The IBC and the resolution process does not contemplate matters being left inchoate. In fact, and to the contrary it exhorts one to accept the seal of finality and quietitude which stands attached to the approval of a Resolution Plan. - On due application of the “eye of the needle” test, it is manifest that the disputes which are spoken of in the Section 11 petition are non-arbitrable and thus no reference to the AT is warranted - HC
Extinguishment of claims - approval of the Resolution Plan - The Court is of the considered opinion that approval of the Resolution Plan in terms given clearly amounts to the extinguishment of all debts that were owed by the corporate debtor except to the extent as was admitted in the Resolution Plan. The IBC and the resolution process does not contemplate matters being left inchoate. In fact, and to the contrary it exhorts one to accept the seal of finality and quietitude which stands attached to the approval of a Resolution Plan. - On due application of the “eye of the needle” test, it is manifest that the disputes which are spoken of in the Section 11 petition are non-arbitrable and thus no reference to the AT is warranted - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.