Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Insolvency and BankruptcyOctober 13, 2023Case LawsHC
Extinguishment of claims - approval of the Resolution Plan - The Court is of the considered opinion that approval of the Resolution Plan in terms given clearly amounts to the extinguishment of all debts that were owed by the corporate debtor except to the extent as was admitted in the Resolution Plan. The IBC and the resolution process does not contemplate matters being left inchoate. In fact, and to the contrary it exhorts one to accept the seal of finality and quietitude which stands attached to the approval of a Resolution Plan. - On due application of the “eye of the needle” test, it is manifest that the disputes which are spoken of in the Section 11 petition are non-arbitrable and thus no reference to the AT is warranted - HC
Extinguishment of claims - approval of the Resolution Plan - The Court is of the considered opinion that approval of the Resolution Plan in terms given clearly amounts to the extinguishment of all debts that were owed by the corporate debtor except to the extent as was admitted in the Resolution Plan. The IBC and the resolution process does not contemplate matters being left inchoate. In fact, and to the contrary it exhorts one to accept the seal of finality and quietitude which stands attached to the approval of a Resolution Plan. - On due application of the “eye of the needle” test, it is manifest that the disputes which are spoken of in the Section 11 petition are non-arbitrable and thus no reference to the AT is warranted - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
