Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Addition u/s 68 - claim of exemption u/s 10(38) denied - Merely because a particular scrip is identified as a penny stock by the income tax department, it does not mean all the transactions carried out in that scrip would be bogus in the hands of all the investors. - Since assessee’s name does not even figure in the list of parties who were involved in manipulation of shares prices of MARL in the order of SEBI dated 30.8.2019 after its detailed investigations, the transaction carried out by the assessee cannot be termed as bogus. - AT
Addition u/s 68 - claim of exemption u/s 10(38) denied - Merely because a particular scrip is identified as a penny stock by the income tax department, it does not mean all the transactions carried out in that scrip would be bogus in the hands of all the investors. - Since assessee’s name does not even figure in the list of parties who were involved in manipulation of shares prices of MARL in the order of SEBI dated 30.8.2019 after its detailed investigations, the transaction carried out by the assessee cannot be termed as bogus. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
