Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Stay of demand / pre-deposit - Levy of penalty - Contravention of Section 18(2) of FERA - failure to realize export proceeds - Appellant contended that the order of the Tribunal has not taken note of the undue hardship that faces the appellant, and ought to have waived the pre-deposit. - The Tribunal has, in waiving 60% of the penalty, and directing deposit of only 40%, taken note of all contentions of the Appellant, including the hardship projected. - Appeal dismissed - HC
Stay of demand / pre-deposit - Levy of penalty - Contravention of Section 18(2) of FERA - failure to realize export proceeds - Appellant contended that the order of the Tribunal has not taken note of the undue hardship that faces the appellant, and ought to have waived the pre-deposit. - The Tribunal has, in waiving 60% of the penalty, and directing deposit of only 40%, taken note of all contentions of the Appellant, including the hardship projected. - Appeal dismissed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
