Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Stay of demand / pre-deposit - Levy of penalty - Contravention of Section 18(2) of FERA - failure to realize export proceeds - Appellant contended that the order of the Tribunal has not taken note of the undue hardship that faces the appellant, and ought to have waived the pre-deposit. - The Tribunal has, in waiving 60% of the penalty, and directing deposit of only 40%, taken note of all contentions of the Appellant, including the hardship projected. - Appeal dismissed - HC
Stay of demand / pre-deposit - Levy of penalty - Contravention of Section 18(2) of FERA - failure to realize export proceeds - Appellant contended that the order of the Tribunal has not taken note of the undue hardship that faces the appellant, and ought to have waived the pre-deposit. - The Tribunal has, in waiving 60% of the penalty, and directing deposit of only 40%, taken note of all contentions of the Appellant, including the hardship projected. - Appeal dismissed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
