Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty - goods were seized goods for not accompanied by E-way bills - Upon a purposive reading of the sections 129, 130 and 138, it would suffice to state that the legislation makes intent to evade tax a sine qua non for initiation of the proceedings under sections 129 and 130 of the CGST Act. - While passing the order of detention, seizure or demand of penalty, tax, no such intent of the petitioner was observed. - HC
Levy of penalty - goods were seized goods for not accompanied by E-way bills - Upon a purposive reading of the sections 129, 130 and 138, it would suffice to state that the legislation makes intent to evade tax a sine qua non for initiation of the proceedings under sections 129 and 130 of the CGST Act. - While passing the order of detention, seizure or demand of penalty, tax, no such intent of the petitioner was observed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
