Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Jurisdiction u/s 263 by CIT(A) - AO has failed to take recourse to the provisions of Section 14A - The interference by the C.I.T. was based on facts and not any change of opinion, thus the order of the CIT is restored. - HC
Jurisdiction u/s 263 by CIT(A) - AO has failed to take recourse to the provisions of Section 14A - The interference by the C.I.T. was based on facts and not any change of opinion, thus the order of the CIT is restored. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.