Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Validity of order passed u/s 92CA - Transfer Pricing - Since the ld. TPO order has been passed on 30/10/2015 which is clearly barred by limitation by one day by virtue of time limit provided u/s. 92CA (3) and consequently, the same has to be treated as bad in law and the same is hereby quashed. Thus, in such a situation, if there is no TPO order, consequently the entire transfer pricing adjustment proposed by the ld. TPO in international transaction becomes non-est and to be quashed and being barred by limitation. - AT
Validity of order passed u/s 92CA - Transfer Pricing - Since the ld. TPO order has been passed on 30/10/2015 which is clearly barred by limitation by one day by virtue of time limit provided u/s. 92CA (3) and consequently, the same has to be treated as bad in law and the same is hereby quashed. Thus, in such a situation, if there is no TPO order, consequently the entire transfer pricing adjustment proposed by the ld. TPO in international transaction becomes non-est and to be quashed and being barred by limitation. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.