Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - abatement percentage permitted on their product - they could not clear the goods from factory by claiming higher abatement due to oversight - goods were cleared by them to their depot and not to the ultimate consumer - The onus which is upon the party as per presumption of Section 12B is therefore not discharged - Appeal dismissed - AT
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - abatement percentage permitted on their product - they could not clear the goods from factory by claiming higher abatement due to oversight - goods were cleared by them to their depot and not to the ultimate consumer - The onus which is upon the party as per presumption of Section 12B is therefore not discharged - Appeal dismissed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.