Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the application - Petitioner has not filed the revised returns u/s 139(5) of the Act but he has admitted to an inadvertent error in declaring total income as Nil vide a rectification application. Admittedly, he is entitled to a refund of Rs. 72,370/- for excess amount of tax deduction at source. - CIT directed to accept the rectified ITR and process the same in accordance with law - HC
Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the application - Petitioner has not filed the revised returns u/s 139(5) of the Act but he has admitted to an inadvertent error in declaring total income as Nil vide a rectification application. Admittedly, he is entitled to a refund of Rs. 72,370/- for excess amount of tax deduction at source. - CIT directed to accept the rectified ITR and process the same in accordance with law - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
