Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Criminal conspiracy - deceive the banks - committing a criminal breach of trust and faith - vicarious liability - It is submitted that Petitioner were never being the Director of the accused companies - In order to constitute the offence, the intention to deceive should be in existence at the time when the inducement was made - on a perusal of the complaint and material, comes to a conclusion that the allegations levelled in the complaint on the face of it does not constitute any offence as against the petitioners. - HC
Criminal conspiracy - deceive the banks - committing a criminal breach of trust and faith - vicarious liability - It is submitted that Petitioner were never being the Director of the accused companies - In order to constitute the offence, the intention to deceive should be in existence at the time when the inducement was made - on a perusal of the complaint and material, comes to a conclusion that the allegations levelled in the complaint on the face of it does not constitute any offence as against the petitioners. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.