Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Return of goods seized - Admittedly, the six months’ period has already lapsed - Indisputably, the Principal Commissioner of Customs has not extended the time period as postulated u/s 110(2) - The continued detention of the mobile phones by the respondents is illegal and untenable. - HC
Return of goods seized - Admittedly, the six months’ period has already lapsed - Indisputably, the Principal Commissioner of Customs has not extended the time period as postulated u/s 110(2) - The continued detention of the mobile phones by the respondents is illegal and untenable. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.