Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Initiation of proceedings u/s 201(1) - period of limitation - It would be interesting to note that on the ground that the two foreign companies had filed applications before the AAR as to taxability of such transactions, petitioner had filed an application before DCIT to keep the proceedings u/s 201 in abeyance. Such an action of the petitioner would run counter to its very contention that the proceedings concluded by respondent No. 1 was beyond limitation. - Order u/s 201(1) sustained - HC
Initiation of proceedings u/s 201(1) - period of limitation - It would be interesting to note that on the ground that the two foreign companies had filed applications before the AAR as to taxability of such transactions, petitioner had filed an application before DCIT to keep the proceedings u/s 201 in abeyance. Such an action of the petitioner would run counter to its very contention that the proceedings concluded by respondent No. 1 was beyond limitation. - Order u/s 201(1) sustained - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
