Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Initiation of proceedings u/s 201(1) - period of limitation - It would be interesting to note that on the ground that the two foreign companies had filed applications before the AAR as to taxability of such transactions, petitioner had filed an application before DCIT to keep the proceedings u/s 201 in abeyance. Such an action of the petitioner would run counter to its very contention that the proceedings concluded by respondent No. 1 was beyond limitation. - Order u/s 201(1) sustained - HC
Initiation of proceedings u/s 201(1) - period of limitation - It would be interesting to note that on the ground that the two foreign companies had filed applications before the AAR as to taxability of such transactions, petitioner had filed an application before DCIT to keep the proceedings u/s 201 in abeyance. Such an action of the petitioner would run counter to its very contention that the proceedings concluded by respondent No. 1 was beyond limitation. - Order u/s 201(1) sustained - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.