Clean slate principle extinguishes uncrystallised operational claims and bars continuation of pending recovery and arbitral proceedings after plan app...
Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Insolvency and BankruptcySeptember 2, 2023Case LawsAT
CIRP - Liquidation Proceedings’ against the ‘Corporate Debtor - pendency of ‘Arbitral Proceedings’ - t the ‘Liquidator’ had correctly rejected the ‘Appellant’/’Applicant’s claim by means of the reasons given in the letter dated 29.01.2022, considering the fact that the ‘Liquidation’ was a ‘time bound process’. - AT
CIRP - Liquidation Proceedings’ against the ‘Corporate Debtor - pendency of ‘Arbitral Proceedings’ - t the ‘Liquidator’ had correctly rejected the ‘Appellant’/’Applicant’s claim by means of the reasons given in the letter dated 29.01.2022, considering the fact that the ‘Liquidation’ was a ‘time bound process’. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.