Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Outstanding demand u/s 177(3) - beneficiaries who are named in the trust as recipients of the income of the trust cannot be considered as an association of persons. - If that be the position, prima facie, the question as to whether Section 177(3) would apply to the Petitioner raises a serious issue for consideration. - HC
Outstanding demand u/s 177(3) - beneficiaries who are named in the trust as recipients of the income of the trust cannot be considered as an association of persons. - If that be the position, prima facie, the question as to whether Section 177(3) would apply to the Petitioner raises a serious issue for consideration. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.