Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Jurisdiction power u/s 263 by CIT(A) - CIT was not justified in not allowing the unabsorbed depreciation against income from capital gains to the extent of admissibility to Rs.66.67 % - HC
Jurisdiction power u/s 263 by CIT(A) - CIT was not justified in not allowing the unabsorbed depreciation against income from capital gains to the extent of admissibility to Rs.66.67 % - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.