Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of Notice calling the petitioner for a hearing challenged in a remand back proceedings - Time limit for completion of assessments and reassessment u/s 153 - Extension of period of limitation after Covid - There is no merits in the challenge to the impugned notice. - HC
Validity of Notice calling the petitioner for a hearing challenged in a remand back proceedings - Time limit for completion of assessments and reassessment u/s 153 - Extension of period of limitation after Covid - There is no merits in the challenge to the impugned notice. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.