Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Applicability of amendment to Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 with retrospective effect - What was imperative was not issuance of a show cause notice but the pendency of dispute relating to adjustment of credit of input used or exemption on final product relating to the period beginning from 10 September 2004 and ending on 31 March 2008 (both days inclusive), being the pending date on which the Finance Bill received assent of the President. - Tribunal rightly granted the relief - HC
Applicability of amendment to Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 with retrospective effect - What was imperative was not issuance of a show cause notice but the pendency of dispute relating to adjustment of credit of input used or exemption on final product relating to the period beginning from 10 September 2004 and ending on 31 March 2008 (both days inclusive), being the pending date on which the Finance Bill received assent of the President. - Tribunal rightly granted the relief - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
