Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Dishonour of Cheque - insufficient funds - meeting the standard...
Court Highlights Standard for Cheque Dishonor Cases: Emphasizes "Preponderance of Probability" and Caution in Granting Summary Judgments Under Order 37.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Dishonour of Cheque - insufficient funds - meeting the standard of “preponderance of probability”, and not mere possibility - Summary judgements under Order 37 should not be granted where serious conflict as to the matter of fact where any difficulty on issues as to law arises, the Court should not reject the defence of the defendant merely because of its inherent implausibility or its inconsistency. - HC
Dishonour of Cheque - insufficient funds - meeting the standard of “preponderance of probability”, and not mere possibility - Summary judgements under Order 37 should not be granted where serious conflict as to the matter of fact where any difficulty on issues as to law arises, the Court should not reject the defence of the defendant merely because of its inherent implausibility or its inconsistency. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
