Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Return of the money / cash which was seized - ITAT accepted observed that the cash seized from Petitioner is the professional income and therefore cannot be treated as unexplained income - The contention of the revenue that the ITAT erred and the Court should not consider the order of the ITAT is highly objectionable. If the Officers of the Income Tax Department are allowed to continue this way, it will result only in undue harassment to assessees and chaos in administration of tax laws. - HC
Return of the money / cash which was seized - ITAT accepted observed that the cash seized from Petitioner is the professional income and therefore cannot be treated as unexplained income - The contention of the revenue that the ITAT erred and the Court should not consider the order of the ITAT is highly objectionable. If the Officers of the Income Tax Department are allowed to continue this way, it will result only in undue harassment to assessees and chaos in administration of tax laws. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
