Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Return of the money / cash which was seized - ITAT accepted observed that the cash seized from Petitioner is the professional income and therefore cannot be treated as unexplained income - The contention of the revenue that the ITAT erred and the Court should not consider the order of the ITAT is highly objectionable. If the Officers of the Income Tax Department are allowed to continue this way, it will result only in undue harassment to assessees and chaos in administration of tax laws. - HC
Return of the money / cash which was seized - ITAT accepted observed that the cash seized from Petitioner is the professional income and therefore cannot be treated as unexplained income - The contention of the revenue that the ITAT erred and the Court should not consider the order of the ITAT is highly objectionable. If the Officers of the Income Tax Department are allowed to continue this way, it will result only in undue harassment to assessees and chaos in administration of tax laws. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
