Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Validity of Reopening of assessment - period of limitation - Although the notice dated 30.06.2021 u/s 148 bears an endorsement at the foot of the page that it has been digitally signed, it is inchoate, in the sense that it is not accompanied by a date. - Admittedly, the said notice was never physically delivered to the assessee. As such, the fact remains that service of the said notice u/s 148 was affected on the petitioner only on 16.07.2021 through email, though the limitation period had already expired on 30.06.2021. - HC
Validity of Reopening of assessment - period of limitation - Although the notice dated 30.06.2021 u/s 148 bears an endorsement at the foot of the page that it has been digitally signed, it is inchoate, in the sense that it is not accompanied by a date. - Admittedly, the said notice was never physically delivered to the assessee. As such, the fact remains that service of the said notice u/s 148 was affected on the petitioner only on 16.07.2021 through email, though the limitation period had already expired on 30.06.2021. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.