Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Exemption u/s. 11 denied - Validity of intimation issued u/s. 143(1)(a) - there are two aspects which emerges on this issue as to whether the disallowance made is a permissible adjustment contained in sec. 143(1)(a) and whether this adjustment, if permissible, has been made in compliance to 1st proviso to sec. 143(1)(a) of the Act. - As perusal of the provisions contained in sec. 143(1)(a) of the Act, we find that on both the aspects, the revenue fails. - AT
Exemption u/s. 11 denied - Validity of intimation issued u/s. 143(1)(a) - there are two aspects which emerges on this issue as to whether the disallowance made is a permissible adjustment contained in sec. 143(1)(a) and whether this adjustment, if permissible, has been made in compliance to 1st proviso to sec. 143(1)(a) of the Act. - As perusal of the provisions contained in sec. 143(1)(a) of the Act, we find that on both the aspects, the revenue fails. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.