Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Rectification u/s 154 - period of limitation - original order passed by the AO dated 05/04/2011 - AO has already passed a suo-moto rectification order u/s 154 dated 18/03/2014 - Even though the surcharge was levied in terms of the first order, the order so sought to be rectified by the assessee is the rectified order dated 18/03/2014 wherein the surcharge continued to be levied on the assessee besides additional interest. Therefore, the rectification application dated 01/07/2016 is well within the limitation period as so prescribed and is not barred by limitation. - AT
Rectification u/s 154 - period of limitation - original order passed by the AO dated 05/04/2011 - AO has already passed a suo-moto rectification order u/s 154 dated 18/03/2014 - Even though the surcharge was levied in terms of the first order, the order so sought to be rectified by the assessee is the rectified order dated 18/03/2014 wherein the surcharge continued to be levied on the assessee besides additional interest. Therefore, the rectification application dated 01/07/2016 is well within the limitation period as so prescribed and is not barred by limitation. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
