Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Addition u/s 56(1) - shares received by the assessee company at the time of amalgamation - the Revenue is not precluded from ascertaining as to whether the scheme of amalgamation was in compliance with the provisions of the Act so as to avail the benefit of Section 47(vi) of the Act. - the scheme of amalgamation of EBPL with the assessee company cannot be disregarded nor can it be held to be a ‘colourable device’. - AT
Addition u/s 56(1) - shares received by the assessee company at the time of amalgamation - the Revenue is not precluded from ascertaining as to whether the scheme of amalgamation was in compliance with the provisions of the Act so as to avail the benefit of Section 47(vi) of the Act. - the scheme of amalgamation of EBPL with the assessee company cannot be disregarded nor can it be held to be a ‘colourable device’. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.