Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Revision u/s 263 - AO treated assessee taxpayer as a “cooperative society” registered u/sec.2(19) - The Revenue argues that the assessee is not a "cooperative society" but a "Souharda" society registered under state law(s). - Their lordships’ of High Court have settled the law therein that a “Souharda” cooperative society registered under the state cooperative law(s) very well forms “a cooperative society” u/sec.2(19) of the Act. - Revision order set aside - AT
Revision u/s 263 - AO treated assessee taxpayer as a “cooperative society” registered u/sec.2(19) - The Revenue argues that the assessee is not a "cooperative society" but a "Souharda" society registered under state law(s). - Their lordships’ of High Court have settled the law therein that a “Souharda” cooperative society registered under the state cooperative law(s) very well forms “a cooperative society” u/sec.2(19) of the Act. - Revision order set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
