Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Revision u/s 263 - AO treated assessee taxpayer as a “cooperative society” registered u/sec.2(19) - The Revenue argues that the assessee is not a "cooperative society" but a "Souharda" society registered under state law(s). - Their lordships’ of High Court have settled the law therein that a “Souharda” cooperative society registered under the state cooperative law(s) very well forms “a cooperative society” u/sec.2(19) of the Act. - Revision order set aside - AT
Revision u/s 263 - AO treated assessee taxpayer as a “cooperative society” registered u/sec.2(19) - The Revenue argues that the assessee is not a "cooperative society" but a "Souharda" society registered under state law(s). - Their lordships’ of High Court have settled the law therein that a “Souharda” cooperative society registered under the state cooperative law(s) very well forms “a cooperative society” u/sec.2(19) of the Act. - Revision order set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
