Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Revision u/s 263 - AO treated assessee taxpayer as a “cooperative society” registered u/sec.2(19) - The Revenue argues that the assessee is not a "cooperative society" but a "Souharda" society registered under state law(s). - Their lordships’ of High Court have settled the law therein that a “Souharda” cooperative society registered under the state cooperative law(s) very well forms “a cooperative society” u/sec.2(19) of the Act. - Revision order set aside - AT
Revision u/s 263 - AO treated assessee taxpayer as a “cooperative society” registered u/sec.2(19) - The Revenue argues that the assessee is not a "cooperative society" but a "Souharda" society registered under state law(s). - Their lordships’ of High Court have settled the law therein that a “Souharda” cooperative society registered under the state cooperative law(s) very well forms “a cooperative society” u/sec.2(19) of the Act. - Revision order set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
