Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Penalty u/s 271FA - non-compliance with the provisions of Section 285BA(1)(b) - non filing of a return in time - The respondents had specifically considered the contention raised by the petitioner and had held that the reasons stated by the petitioner do not constitute a reasonable cause to excuse their delay of 525 days in submitting the returns. It is also clear that though the provision permits the imposition of Rs.500/- per day as penalty only Rs.100/- per day has been inflicted. - Petition dismissed - HC
Penalty u/s 271FA - non-compliance with the provisions of Section 285BA(1)(b) - non filing of a return in time - The respondents had specifically considered the contention raised by the petitioner and had held that the reasons stated by the petitioner do not constitute a reasonable cause to excuse their delay of 525 days in submitting the returns. It is also clear that though the provision permits the imposition of Rs.500/- per day as penalty only Rs.100/- per day has been inflicted. - Petition dismissed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
