Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopening beyond period of four years - reasons to believe - Even assuming, Revenues’ case is petitioner should have disclosed that these were bogus or accommodation entries, still there is nothing on record to indicate that petitioner was aware that these were bogus shares capital/premium from bogus paper companies, viz., SHPL and SCPL and were accommodation entries. - Notice quahsed and set aside - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopening beyond period of four years - reasons to believe - Even assuming, Revenues’ case is petitioner should have disclosed that these were bogus or accommodation entries, still there is nothing on record to indicate that petitioner was aware that these were bogus shares capital/premium from bogus paper companies, viz., SHPL and SCPL and were accommodation entries. - Notice quahsed and set aside - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.